As
I lifted the rod its weight took me by surprise. For a second I thought the tip was stuck in
one of those infamous unseen objects that grab your feet, in attempt to make
you go swimming, while walking along shore line. However, I could see that the
rod tip was lifting just fine; all 10 pounds of it. Balance had obviously not
been thought of when this rod was built.
It felt as if I had lifted it by the wrong end.
My
first back cast went ok, then as I attempted my forward cast at a pace that
would have been perfect with a graphite rod, I thought, “Well, this isn’t going
to end well.” I was right. 30 feet of
bunched up line and leader splashed heavily on the water only a few feet away
from my feet. And to top it off, Reed
chuckled loudly in the back ground.
Knowing
I could drive the Sherman tank of a fly rod I was careful to watch my back cast
slowly unwind behind and when I say slow, that is an understatement. As Reed so
elegantly put it, “You can start your back cast, light up a cigarette, have a
sip of coffee and still have to wait before making your forward cast.”
In
the 20 years that I have been fly fishing, I had used only one rod until this
past fall when a great friend gave me a TFO 9’, 5 wt. graphite rod that was
half the weight of my 1990 8’ 6”, 5 wt. fiberglass Fenwick. The TFO had a noticeable difference in line
speed which took some getting used to.
The engineer in me couldn’t simply accept the fact that I felt as if I
had to rush my casting in comparison to my Fenwick®, which only lead to more
curiosity when I found that there was a thing called Fly Rod Flex Index that
measures a rods action. Casting Reeds
circa 1913 split cane rod made the lights come on and suddenly it all made
perfect sense. Some rods are faster or
slower than others and this particular rod was slower than a one legged dog on
tranquilizers.
Once
getting the timing down and learning to take my time [I mean, really taking
your sweet arse time] the antique rod was a pleasure to cast.